Tagged: Alexander Campbell Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • drkenney 12:58 pm on 2016-05-16 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alexander Campbell,   

    Alexander Campbell & New Testamentism 

    Cool Alexander Campbell

    “We have no system of our own, nor of others, to substitute in lieu of the reigning systems. We only aim at substituting the New Testament in lieu of every creed in existence; whether Mahometan, Pagan, Jewish, or Sectarian. We wish to call Christians to consider that Jesus Christ has made them kings and priests to God. We neither advocate Calvinism, Arminianism, Arianism, Socinianism, Trinitarianism, Unitarianism, Deism, or Sectarianism, but New Testamentism.”

    Alexander Campbell, Christian Baptist, Vol. 1, No. 5,  1 December 1823 

     
  • drkenney 3:37 pm on 2016-04-07 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alexander Campbell,   

    Alexander Campbell & the Godhead 

    Alexander Campbell on the Godhead1

    “For the divine nature may be communicated or imparted in some sense; and indeed while it is essentially and necessarily singular, it is certainly plural in its personal manifestations. Hence we have the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit equally divine, though personally distinct from each other. We have in fact, but one God, one Lord, one Holy Spirit; yet these are equally possessed of one and of the same divine nature. Some conceive of God as mathematical unit; and as a thing cannot be both mathematically singular and plural, one and three, at the same time and in the same sense, they deny the true and proper divinity of the Son of God and of the Spirit of God. But it would seem to us, that they reason not in harmony with the sacred style of inspiration. But why should we imagine that there cannot be a plurality of personal manifestations in the divine nature any more than in the angelic or human, especially as man was created in the image of God?” — Alexander Campbell, The Christian System, p. 8.

     
    • Someone 6:14 pm on 2016-04-07 Permalink | Reply

      I was reading an earlier post about Jews worshipping God (at the wailing wall) and that your god is not the same one they worship. Is Alexander Campbell your religion’s founder? Is this a Christian religion? If so, it seems a strange denomination. Can you direct me to another site where I can read a little more about you? Thank you.

      • Someone 6:41 am on 2016-04-09 Permalink | Reply

        Never mind. I found your main ICOC site: http://www.disciplestoday.org. I’ll read some more about you.

        • Eugene Adkins 8:19 am on 2016-04-09 Permalink | Reply

          “Someone”,

          I just wanted to let you know that contributing authors in TFR aren’t members of the “International Churches of Christ” (which I believe is the where the link that you left leads to), but rather members of the church of Christ in the Romans 16:16 sense. In other words, we believe in the one universal church, but we’re not Romans Catholics 😉

          Since we have no earthly head/headquarters, it’s a little difficult to point you toward “one” website in particular. Here are a couple of websites (You Can Be Sure, House to House) that can help you learn about some of our “fundamental” views based on our understanding of God’s word.

          Not trying to get involved in your conversation; I just wanted to make sure you got a response from someone.

          Thanks for taking the time to comment.

    • drkenney 9:04 am on 2016-04-09 Permalink | Reply

      I thought I had replied to the inquiry; however, somehow my response did not make it to the comments section. My apologies.

      Alexander Campbell never claimed to be a founder of a church. He, and others before and after him, plead for people to give up denominationalism and sectarianism and pursue the New Testament. Martin Luther said “Sola Scripture” meaning the Scriptures alone are the authority, not popes or councils. This is the same sentiment as Campbell’s viewpoint. Campbell was highly effective and held prominent debates exposing several religious errors popular in his day. Because he was so effective, he has been, and still is, maligned by his critics with labels such as “Campbellism” or “Campbellite”. He clearly stated that he was NOT the founder of a new denomination, but that does not stop his critics from maligning him. As I stated, he is not the first one to plea for New Testament Christianity. Others did as well, some before Alexander Campbell ever came to the United States. Alexander Campbell was a scholar, but he was not perfect. We do not recognize him as the founder of churches of Christ, but we admire his plea for what he called the Ancient Order of Things.

      The Jews worship the same God in one sense. The recognize Jehovah as God, as we do. Where they fall short is failing to recognize Jesus as the Messiah, the Son of God. So, it is not that they worship a different God exactly, they just fail to realize that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are of the same divine nature. This is why we believe completely in the Old Testament. There is an important old saying that illustrates this well–“The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed. The New Testament is the Old Testament revealed.” The two testaments go together, but the Jews reject the New Testament to their error.

      There have been those who have departed from the plea to restore New Testament Christianity. Some of these still claim Alexander Campbell in their history; however, some of their practices he would not agree with. There are some things he advocated that we would not agree with either. Alexander Campbell is not respected as a founder of the church, but he is respected because he pointed people back to the founder of the church and His New Testament. The final authority is the New Testament.

      If you want to read more about me, I post here and also at my own personal blog–www.drkenney.blogspot.com.

  • drkenney 2:50 pm on 2015-10-01 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alexander Campbell   

    Alexander Campbell & Inward Call of Holy Spirit 

    Alexander Campbell

    Alexander Campbell

    “But let me ask, and seriously ask these inward called saints, who have heard some other voice of God than the word of God, What did that voice say?  Any thing different from that which is written?  If so, how did you judge it?  To what standard did, you refer it?  If it said any thing to you different from what is written, you dare not hearken to it:  for the written gospel, Jesus declared, will judge you at the last day.  If it said nothing different from the written gospel, it must have repeated the same, and what was the meaning of repeating it?  Does the word of God derive power from mere repeating it?  Does the word of God derive power from a mere repetition of it; or must God, like men, use frequent repetitions to supply the lack of power?  Can the voice of God have more power in one language, than another-at one time than another-at one place than in another?  You cannot answer, Yes.  What do you mean by an inward call?  If there be a word spoken it must be what is written or what is not written.  And you must see that either hypothesis issues in that which is inadmissible-in that which is absurd.” 

    Alexander Campbell, “The Voice of God and the Word of God.  The Gospel Now The Word of God,”  Millennial Harbinger, 1830, pp. 126-127.

     
  • drkenney 8:10 pm on 2015-07-21 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alexander Campbell,   

    Alexander Campbell & Pursuit of The Truth 

    Alexander Campbell

    Alexander Campbell

    “OFTEN have I said, and often have I written, that truth, truth eternal and divine, is now, and long has been with me the pearl of great price. To her I will, with the blessing of God, sacrifice every thing. But on no altar will I offer her a victim. If I have lost sight of her, God who searcheth the hearts knows I have not done it intentionally. With my whole heart I have sought the truth, and I know that I have found it. Not all truth but the lifegiving truth of Jesus. But I ask no man to take my word for it.  Neither my devotion to the truth professed, the earnestness nor the industry with which I have sought it, the sacrifices which l have made in the pursuit of it, nor any aid supernatural which I have received in the discovery of the truth, shall ever be plead by me as reason why any person should receive any single saying of mine upon my authority.  Nor shall I plead the success which has attended my labors, the great revolution in sentiment, feeling, and practice, which is every day progressing, as a proof, or as any evidence of truths for which I am the humble advocate. No authority of great names, no authority of great success, no authority of great devotion, no authority but that of the Apostles and prophets shall ever be urged by me in proof of any proposition respecting the religion of Jesus Christ.”

    — Alexander Campbell, Millennial Harbinger, Vol. 1, No. 3, March 1, 1830

     
    • Loy Pressley 3:55 am on 2015-07-22 Permalink | Reply

      Thank you!!

      The date, however, cannot be 1980. According to Google, Alexander Campbell was born in 1788 and died in 1866.

      Agape,

      Loy

    • drkenney 11:37 am on 2015-07-22 Permalink | Reply

      Loy, thanks for catching my error. I must have had Ronald Reagan on my mind for some reason. I corrected the quote. Thanks, David

  • drkenney 1:36 pm on 2014-04-15 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alexander Campbell   

    Alexander Campbell & Controversy 

    Sage of Bethany

    “If there was no error in principle or practice, then controversy, which is only another name for opposition to error, real or supposed, would be unnecessary. If it were lawful, or if it were benevolent, to make a truce with error, then opposition to it would be both unjust and unkind. If error were innocent and harmless, then we might permit it to find its own quietus, or to immortalize itself. But so long as it is confessed that error is more or less injurious to the welfare of society, individually and collectively considered, then no man can be considered benevolent who does not set his face against it. In proportion as a person is intelligent and benevolent, he will be controversial, if error exist around him. Hence the Prince of Peace never sheathed the sword of the Spirit while he lived. He drew it on the banks of the Jordan and threw the scabbard away.”

    — Alexander Campbell, “Religious Controversy,” Millennial Harbinger, Vol. 1, No. 1, January 4, 1830.

     
  • drkenney 7:54 am on 2013-03-04 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alexander Campbell   

    Alexander Campbell & the Most Reproachful Epithet of “Campbellite” 

    Alexander Campbell"The Sage of Bethany"

    Alexander Campbell
    “The Sage of Bethany”

    “Some religious editors in Kentucky call those who are desirous of seeing the ancient order of things restored, ‘The Restorationers,’ ‘the Campbellites,’ and the most reproachful epithets are showered upon them because they have some conscientious regard for the Divine Author and the divine authority of the New Testament–This may go down very well with some; but all who fear God and keep his commandments will pity and deplore the weaknesses and folly of those who either think to convince or to persuade by such means.”

    — Alexander Campbell, Christian Baptist, Buffaloe (Bethany), Brooke County, Virginia (West Virginia), Volume 4, Number 4, November 6, 1826.

     
  • drkenney 12:55 pm on 2013-01-05 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alexander Campbell   

    Alexander Campbell & Christian Sabbath 

    Alexander Campbell(1788-1866 )

    Alexander Campbell
    (1788-1866 )

    I have been enjoying Eva Jean Wrather’s Alexander Campbell  — Adventurer in Freedom the past several weeks.  I have completed the first volume which covers Alexander Campbell’s birth, coming to American, printing of Thomas Campbell’s Declaration & Address, and his first debate which was with John Walker, Seceder Presbyterian.  I just finished her writing on the debate with W. L. MaCcalla in Kentucky, and Alexander Campbell’s launch of his new periodical The Christian Baptist in Wrather’s second installment of her Alexander Campbell Trilogy.

    I can understand why Alexander Campbell’s writings generated so much controversy then, as I have been discussing various points of doctrine with friends who do not agree with my teaching’s of the New Testament.  I am struck by how forceful and powerful Alexander Campbell’s writings were in his day which motivates me to read more about him and his writings.  For example, Alexander Campbell attacked the Presbyterian Moralists Societies for their binding of Sundays as a “Christian Sabbath” even going so far as having people fined by magistrates for not adhering to their view on “Christian Sabbaths” and other matters.  If a citizen witnessed someone doing work on Sundays, then they could report them for a portion of the fine imposed.

    Alexander Campbell’s essay on the subjection of “Christian Sabbaths” in 1823 was very powerful, and it would bring people to the discussion who may have otherwise never meditated on such matters.  Consider this statement from his essay:

    “No two days are more unlike in their import and design, than the Sabbath and the first day. The former commemorated the consummation of the old creation, the cessation of creation work; the latter commemorates the beginning of the new creation. The former was to Israel, a memorial that they were once slaves in Egypt—the latter assures us that the year of release has come. The former looked back, with mournful aspect, to the toils and sorrows entailed upon the human body, from an evil incident to the old creation—trie latter looks forward, with en eve beaming with hope, to perpetual exemption from toil, and pain, and sorrow. The sabbath was a day of awful self-denial and profound religious gloom—the resurrection day is a day of triumph, of holy joy, and religious festivity.” 

    (Alexander Campbell, Editor, “Address to the Readers of the Christian Baptist, No. 3,” The Christian Baptist, Vol 1, No. 7, February 2, 1824)

     
  • drkenney 1:15 pm on 2012-08-24 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alexander Campbell   

    Alexander Campbell & Systematic Theology 

     

    Image

    Alexander Campbell had completed a tour of eastern Virginia.  In the May 1856 issue of the Millennial Harbinger he delivered a report of his tour.  In the course of the report, he made an important statement which should serve as a reminder to us, including myself, when we pursue various works under the theme of “Systematic Theology”:

    I also added, that I was led by parental authority to memorize much of the Christian Scriptures, and especially the Epistles of Paul; and pre-eminently, that to the Romans and that to the Hebrews. These were my systematic theology, or, rather, my doctrinal Christology, to which I owed more than to all my memorizing of the creeds and catechisms of the present Scotch orthodoxy. To this faith I pertinaciously adhered, and on it alone I founded all my future prospects, in time and eternity. 

    — Alexander Campbell, Millennial Harbinger, Volume 6, Number 5, May 1856

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel