Tagged: apologetics Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • TFRStaff 7:13 am on 2016-03-28 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics, ,   

    The Case for Christianity 

    To “make a case” for something is to explain convincingly why it is true or to be believed. This may be done in any number of ways. It involves looking at the evidence in support of something, and considering its implications. This may also involve considering arguments opposed to it and analyzing what, if any, validity they may possess.

    The case for Christianity is strong and convincing. Studying the arguments in favor of Christianity with an open mind can be a faith-building and truly life-changing experience. Such an analysis provides hope and encouragement not only as to this earthly life, but into eternity.  Read >>

    AP Web Logo

     
  • TFRStaff 4:18 am on 2015-05-05 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics, , , Flying Spaghetti Monster, , , , polytheism   

    How Can a Person Know Which God Exists? by Apologetics Press 

    Several decades ago, the United States was overwhelmingly Christian in its religious persuasion. When naturalism and Darwinian evolution picked up speed in the U.S. and challenged the biblical story of man’s origins—the perspective most held by Americans—apologists sprang up in response, dealing a death blow to the naturalistic religion in the minds of many. Once evolutionary theory had been dealt with, both biblically and scientifically, it was natural for many Americans to recognize that they had always been right—Christianity is the true religion.

    Sadly, under the banner of “tolerance,” the “politically correct” police have made significant inroads in compelling the American public, not only to tolerate, but to endorse and encourage pluralism and the proliferation of false religion in America. What was once an understood conclusion—that if evolution is wrong, then biblical Creation must be true—is now heavily challenged in America.

    It has become a popular tactic among atheistic scoffers to mock Bible believers by sarcastically arguing that there’s just as much evidence for the Flying Spaghetti Monster as there is for any god. Therefore, if intelligent design doctrine deserves time in the classroom, so does the doctrine of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster—the Pastafarians (cf. Langton, 2005; Butt, 2010, p. 12). Read >>

     
  • TFRStaff 7:04 am on 2015-01-07 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , apologetics, , , ,   

    3 Good Reasons to Believe the Bible is from God – Apologetics Press 

    The Bible is the most popular book that has ever been printed. It was one of the first books mass produced on Gutenberg’s printing press in 1455. To estimate a total number of Bibles and portions of it that have been produced and distributed worldwide throughout history would be virtually impossible, but the number stands well over 10 billion, since the United Bible Society alone has distributed over nine billion in the past 70 years (“God Facts,” n.d.). Without dispute, the Bible is the best selling book of all time worldwide (“Best Selling…,” 2014).

    Read >>

     
    • Pete 9:39 pm on 2015-01-07 Permalink | Reply

      I believe that the bible is the inspired word of God. I do not think your posting (3 reasons to believe the bible is from God) show any reasons for this assumption. I read this post in the science section of WordPress and I think those that read this section need quite a bit more tangible facts than it is the most p[popular book in the world.

      • Eugene Adkins 6:46 am on 2015-01-08 Permalink | Reply

        Hello, Pete.

        Thanks for sharing your thoughts/concerns.

        If memory serves me correctly, when the article referred to the supporting evidence of the Bible being from God in relation to science I don’t think AP’s major claim was that the Bible is the most popular book in the world. I believe their point revolved around the Bible’s scientific claims, and behaviors toward sicknesses and general health, that were made previous (and by previous, we’re talking multiple millennium’s worth of time with some) to any knowledge “gained/proven” by the modern secular scientific world.

        I would encourage anyone to check out “REASON #2: SCIENTIFIC ACCURACY AND FOREKNOWLEDGE” for what I am referring to; and hence you’ll find the reason that the article was given a science tag. In that section, the particular phrase (or anything else close to it) “the Bible is most popular book in the world” is not used/given as a reason for scientific evidence.

  • TFRStaff 7:26 am on 2014-10-09 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics, ,   

    7 Reasons to Believe in God from Apologetics Press 

    7 Reasons to Believe in God

    How can you know that God exists? You can’t see, hear, touch, smell, or taste Him. You can’t weigh Him like you can a five-pound bag of potatoes. You can’t put Him under an electron microscope to show your friends what He looks like on an atomic level. You can’t experiment on Him with probes and scalpels. You can’t take a picture of Him to show your neighbor that He’s not just an imaginary friend. You can’t magically make Him appear in the classroom of an atheistic professor who is challenging anyone to prove that God exists. So how can you know that God exists?
     

     
  • TFRStaff 5:36 am on 2014-01-28 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics, , undenominational Christianity   

    Hugh’s News & Views (Apologist) 

    HUGH’S NEWS & VIEWS

    I AM AN APOLOGIST

    According to The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, an apology is “an acknowledgment expressing regret or asking pardon for a fault or offense.” To apologize is “to make excuse for or regretful acknowledgement of a fault or offense.” On the other hand, according to the same authority, an apologist is “a person who argues in defense or justification of another person or cause.” An apologia is “a formal defense or justification.” Apologetics (which is plural in form, but used with a singular verb), is defined as “the branch of theology that deals with the defense and proof of Christianity.”

    In his Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, W. E. Vine defines the Greek word apologia as “a verbal defence, a speech in defence, [and] is sometimes translated ‘answer’ in the A. V.” (King James Version of 1611). Vine then cites several passages in which this Greek word is used. [Note: “Defence” is the spelling in Vine’s work.] (More …)

     
  • Eugene Adkins 7:24 am on 2012-03-21 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics,   

    Then the dust will return to the… 

    Then the dust will return to the earth as it was, And the spirit will return to God who gave it.”

    In a conversation a few days ago on another blogger’s site, I was discussing the difference in the way that science treats “the theory of the origin of life” and the way (or the lack thereof) that science has demonstrated that “theory.” The majority of my conversation was with a gentleman named, Walt. Walt (taking more of an agnostic point of view than an atheistic one I believe) respectfully maintained that science is the key to finding the origin of life. Our conversation went on for a little while about the definition of words and the discoveries of science.

    After a while, I made this statment about the futility of finding God through a purely scientific endeavor…

    Every time science opens a door there is another door to be opened and that’s the way that it always will be because that’s the way God has created this natural world. If you’re looking for evidence of a Creator it’s right in front of our faces – but if you’re looking for evidence by opening a door of science that has “flashing lights saying GOD – GOD – GOD” then keeping looking for it. Faith is what pleases God – not PHD’s and other diploma’s of higher education or scientific experiments that really at the end of the day only prove one thing – we’re going to die.”

    Walt’s response to this was refreshingly different from most. He said, This is a fascinating statement to me and brutally honest. I agree with you!”

    While I don’t think my statement was brutal in the way that most think of when they hear the word, the fact remains that life on this planet has an end point; and it’s at the end point of life that the starting point is really going to begin.

    Have a great day appreciating your salvation, and remember to “sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear;” (1 Peter 3:15 – NKJV)

     
  • Richard Mansel 3:24 pm on 2011-06-25 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics, , ,   

    “If Jesus was a liar, a con man, and therefore an evil, foolish man, then how can we explain the fact that He left us with the most profound moral instruction and powerful moral examples that anyone ever has left? Could a deceiver–an imposter of monstrous proportions–teach such unselfish ethical truths and live such a morally exemplary life as Jesus did? The very notion is incredulous.”

    Josh McDowell, “More Evidence That Demands a Verdict,” page 159.
     
  • Richard Mansel 3:21 pm on 2011-06-25 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics, , , ,   

    “If you were to take the sum total of all authoritative articles ever written by the most qualified of psychologists and psychiatrists on the subject of mental hygiene–if you were to combine them and refine them and cleave out the excess verbiage–if you were to take the whole of the meat and none of the parsley, and if you were to have these unadulterated bits of pure scientific knowledge concisely expressed by the most capable of living poets, you would have an awkward and incomplete summation of the Sermon on the Mount” [Psychiatrist, J.T. Fisher]

    “More Evidence That Demands a Verdict” by Josh McDowell, page 162].
     
  • TFRStaff 5:47 pm on 2011-06-11 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics,   

    Blogging on apologetics 

    Here’s a note from David Koeberlin:

    A little over a year ago I taught a class on apologetics. The class lasted about 3 years. In an extension of this endeavor, I have set up a blog in order to post the class notes. I thought you may be interested in viewing it. Here is the link:

    http://daviddale3.blogspot.com/

     
    • David Koeberlin 6:23 pm on 2011-06-11 Permalink | Reply

      Thank you TFR Staff for puting my silly blog on this site. I pray that it will help in our fight. I will be adding additional class notes in the weeks to come. Again, thank you so very much. God bless you

  • Richard Mansel 8:18 am on 2010-08-04 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics, , thomas b. warren   

    Apologetics 

    John Henson reports today on Forthright about a new Apologetics Center that is planned. It will be named after Thomas B. Warren, that great warrior for the faith. Read the story here.

     
  • Weylan Deaver 8:55 pm on 2010-02-23 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics, , Dembski, , old earth, theodicy, young earth   

    The End of Christianity 

    William Dembski’s new book was one of those rare ones that I knew I had to buy, and which I really wanted to like. He does have some very keen insights as an unusual combination of philosopher, theologian, and mathematician. But I just couldn’t get past his opposition to a young earth. Here’s a review:

    http://wp.me/pF5Qb-2n

     
  • philsanders 4:18 pm on 2009-12-08 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apologetics, , ,   

    Books I’m Reading 

    Already Gone by Ken Ham & Britt Beemer

    I’m also reading Deceiving Winds by Bruce Morton, just published by 21st Century Christian. An excellent read about culture and Christianity.

     
    • Richard Mansel 4:20 pm on 2009-12-08 Permalink | Reply

      I forgot to mention that I am also reading Morton’s book. Thanks for the suggestion that you made to me recently.

      • mark mcwhorter 3:38 am on 2009-12-09 Permalink | Reply

        I am also reading Morton’s book. I agree with Woodson’s review, you may not agree with everything he says, but it does incite deeper thought.

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel