What does the Bible say about God’s goodness?

“Therefore consider the goodness and severity of God: on those who fall, severity; but toward you, goodness, if you continue in His goodness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off” (Romans 11:22).

“Good and upright is the Lord” (Psalm 25:8)

“For you, Lord, are good, and ready to forgive, and abundant in mercy to all those who call upon you” (Psalm 86:5).

“The earth is full of the goodness of the Lord” (Psalm 33:5).

“The goodness of God endures continually” (Psalm 52:1).

“So Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good but one, that is, God” (Mark 10:18).

As the above verses indicate, there is so much said in the Bible about God’s goodness, and that is the emphasis of this writing. But the Bible also says much about the severity of God, and how He punishes the disobedient. At Romans 11:22, Paul was writing to Christians telling them of God’s goodness and blessings to them as they continued faithful but reminded them of His severity if they fell away from faithfulness to God.

The goodness of God refers to His love, kindness, benevolence, generosity, etc., but on the other hand, His severity means His demand for obedience, rigid conformity to His will, His strictness and intensity, etc.

God is good all the time in His goodness toward us. The song states that “God is so good. He answers prayers; He cares for me; I love Him so; He’s so good to me.”

James 1:17 tells us, “Every good gift and perfect gift is from above.” Matthew 5:45 tells us that God “makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and the unjust.” God loves and blesses all with His material blessings, but His spiritual blessings in Christ are for those who are obedient to Him (Ephesians 1:3). To enjoy these spiritual blessings we must become a Christian, a follower of Christ by our faith in Jesus as God’s Son, repenting of our sins, confessing our faith before men, and being baptized into Christ.

As we think of God’s goodness to us, and especially the gift of His Son (John 3:16), it should cause us to want to obey and live for Jesus. Romans 2:4 states it this way, “Or do not despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and long-suffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance.”

The goodness of God that leads us to become a Christian should cause us to always be faithful to Him, and He will take us to heaven at the end of our journey on earth. – Douglas M. Williams, Sr.

#goodness-of-god

The Goodness of God and Eternal Punishment By Wayne Jackson

The late Bertrand Russell, a renowned British agnostic, wrote a small publication titled, Why I Am Not A Christian. One of the reasons he cited for his unbelief was that Jesus Christ taught that there is an eternal hell for the wicked.

Russell could not harmonize Christ’s doctrine about hell with the biblical position of a just and benevolent God; hence, he rejected the teaching of Jesus and inclined toward the belief that there is no God. Russell, who lived a life of reckless abandon, echoed the sentiments of Cain: “My punishment is greater than I can bear.” On that basis, he became a determined opponent of true religion.

The problem of reconciling eternal retribution with the goodness of God also has had a significant impact on the religious world. Many religions, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, and the World Wide Church of God (Armstrongism), have rejected the doctrine of the eternal punishment of the wicked. Even the churches of Christ have had their advocates of this erroneous viewpoint (see Fudge, Smith).

Ad Hominem Arguments

An ad hominem argument (meaning, “to the man”) is the type of reasoning that focuses on an opponent’s inconsistency. Let us, at the outset of this discussion, utilize this form of argument in response to the “no hell” theory.

First, a major premise of the “no eternal punishment” dogma is the notion that such is at variance with true justice. The argument might be framed like this. The Bible speaks of a just and good God; it also teaches the doctrine of eternal hell. These two positions are mutually exclusive. Therefore, the Scriptures are inconsistent and cannot be true.

We insist, however, that those who thus argue are under obligation to defend their use of the terms “just” and “good.” By whose standard are these character traits to be measured? Critics of the Bible must not be allowed to become “theological dictionaries unto themselves.” Their reasoning is based solely upon their own ideas of how goodness and justice should be expressed.

If it is true that the Scriptures teach that God has appointed eternal punishment for impenitently evil people, and if it likewise is correct that the Bible affirms the justice and goodness of Jehovah, then it must follow that eternal punishment is not inconsistent with the nature of God. It is at odds only with some men’s perception of goodness and justice.

Second, no one (skeptic or otherwise) is ready to concede that evildoers are unworthy of any type of punishment. It is recognized that no society could survive in such an atmosphere. Should the rapist, the robber, and the murderer be told: “Admittedly, you have done wrong, but we (society) will not punish you for your crimes. This would be unjust”? Is there anyone who argues that there should be no consequences resulting from criminal conduct? Surely not! It is conceded, therefore, that punishment is not inconsistent with true justice.

Third, let us take our reasoning a step further. Is it the case that genuine justice can be served even when an evil man’s punishment is extended beyond the time involved in the commission of his crime? Do we, for example, in our criminal justice system, ask the murderer, “Sir, how long did it take you to kill your wife?”—then assign his incarceration accordingly? Would justice be maintained by such an approach?

Here, then, is the point. True justice, combined with genuine goodness, allows the possibility that a wrongdoer may be required to suffer a penalty that is considerably longer than the duration of his evil. The real issue, therefore, is not punishment per se, or even protracted punishment; rather, it is eternal punishment. The skeptic (or religious materialist) simply wants to tell God how long the penalty is to be! Remember, however, in a system of true justice, the offender is not allowed to set his own sentence.

Eternal Punishment and a Just God

Since no one has ever returned from the dead to discuss his or her personal experiences, this issue is not one that can be settled by human speculation; rather, it must be decided by divine revelation. When the relevant biblical data is assembled, it will be seen, even from man’s jaundiced viewpoint, that the fact of eternal punishment is not inconsistent with the character of a righteous God. Our case will be set forth in a series of interrelated propositions. Continue reading

#ad-hominem, #christian-courier, #eternal-punishment, #god, #goodness-of-god, #hell, #jesus, #nature-of-the-body, #nature-of-the-soul, #punishment, #redemption, #religion, #salvation, #sin, #the-cross, #the-resurrection, #theology, #wayne-jackson