Tagged: leadership Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • J. Randal Matheny 12:38 pm on 2016-05-18 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , leadership, , ,   

    Striking the right note 

    piano-note

    Years ago, an elderly couple in a congregation whom we barely knew were often heard to say, “We just want to love everybody.” Their phrase has stuck with me across the decades.

    I don’t know what they meant by it. Did they want to ignore the doctrine of Christ and be, back in that day, all-inclusive? Had they been hurt seeing some harsh attitudes in the body of Christ?

    They were not prominent people in the congregation. Even their attendance may not have been as regular as one might expect. Back then, their phrase didn’t impress me much. It seemed to leave too much out. Maybe they meant to cut away beliefs or actions important to others. Maybe not.

    Whatever they meant by it, they struck the right note. The Way is the path of love, if it is anything. One thing for certain, God just wants to love everybody. And not only wants, but seeks it.

    God sent his Son for salvation. He sent his Spirit for transformation. He sent his Word for sanctification. All in the name of love.

    Maybe that couple was on to more than I knew. (More …)

     
  • Eugene Adkins 6:35 am on 2015-07-10 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: common people, leadership,   

    And the common people heard him gladly 

    Then Jesus answered and said, while He taught in the temple, “How is it that the scribes say that the Christ is the Son of David? For David himself said by the Holy Spirit: ‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.”’ Therefore David himself calls Him ‘Lord’; how is He then his Son?” And the common people heard Him gladly.” (Mark 12:35-37)

    Why did the common people make up the majority of Jesus’ eager students?

    Was it because of the preconceived notions that some had about the Messiah?

    Was it because of the topics that Jesus preached on?

    Was it because of the miracles that Jesus performed?

    Was it because Jesus had made a mockery of the religious leaders of the day?

    Or was it because the “common” people were made up of individuals who had a desire to be a sheep with the shepherd more than being a shepherd with the sheep?

    Just a thought.

     
  • Ron Thomas 10:00 am on 2014-11-03 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , leadership, wrong side of an issue, wrong side of the bed   

    The Wrong Side of the Bed 

     

    Have you ever been asked: “Did you get up on the wrong side of the bed?” The question is asked because one’s disposition is short and irritable. I suppose we all have gotten up on the wrong side of the bed on occasion. The wrong side of the bed can turn out okay as the day progresses, but that is not often the case with one who is on the wrong side of an issue.

    Those on the wrong side of an issue take the quickest exception to that which is said by another, especially the preacher. Those who are emotionally and/or spiritually insecure can quickly interpret that which is said by another in the worst sort of way. Unfortunate though it is, the problem is with the one who is insecure and on the wrong side of an issue.

    The wrong side of an issue, in this case, is in direct relation to what the Bible teaches. The Bible teaches a particular point (and it makes no difference what the particular teaching is), and this point is sustained in discussion and study, but the one who wants to hold on to a contrary point then begins to find fault, sometimes even leaving the fellowship. I know of churches with a leadership that would be on the wrong side of Bible teaching, have others point it out, but refuse to talk and study the Scriptures further. Why would they do this? Because there is a desire to leave the Lord’s fellowship and go along with a more popular opinion.  This is not always the case, of course.

    In any case, by and large, in a local congregation, those on the wrong side of an issue can fail to see the forest because of the trees. That means there is a failure to see the Lord’s way (the forest) because the trees (personal desire) gets in the way. It is bad when one is on the wrong side of an issue, but it is disastrous when that one, or those ones, is on the wrong side on Judgment Day.

     

     
  • Ron Thomas 8:00 am on 2013-06-25 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , leadership, , roles,   

    The Husband is Head 

    In the “spirit of this world” there is a challenge the Lord’s people have with regard to the Lord’s will concerning the family. In today’s environment, the husband is not the head of the house, but merely a co-authority alongside his wife. The male and female were created (and are still) equal in the Lord’s eyes (Genesis 1:26; 2:18), but with that declaration of the Lord’s, there is also the declaration concerning who the leader in the family is (1 Corinthians 11:3).

    When the Lord brought the male and female together that He created, He brought two equals and made them into one whole (Genesis 2:23-24). Though both the male and female are equals, they were given different roles within the family structure. Paul made this plain in his writings to the church at Ephesus and to Timothy (also at Ephesus). To the church he wrote, the husband is the head of his wife like Christ is the head of the church. The very use of the word head in this context indicates authority. Lest we misunderstand what that authority entails, consider the remainder of the chapter (Ephesians 5:22-33).

    The word head, indicating authority, is not dictatorial—not even close! It is authority based on love, and love always seeks that which is best for the other person. Christ is the savior of the body, and the husband is to seek to save (or protect) his wife from the outside harm that will surely come to her if he fails to make the right choices in leading his family (poor choices are made by both the male and female in any and all relationships). This is what love does.

    The insecure (and spiritually weak) husband who demands that his wife must obey him, this is a man who is operating, not from love, but spiritual infirmity. What kind of spirit of a man will operate in such a way as this? Only one who is insecure and weak of spirit! Someone might object to this sentiment with, “Does not the Scripture say she must obey him in all things”? It does say this with regard to children (Colossians 3:20), but with regard to the wife it does not say this, and the wife is not a child!

    In Titus 2:5, Paul exhorts the older women to teach the younger women to be obedient to their husbands (Titus 2:5). Given what we know of God’s love and Jesus’ example, what do you think is in mind? Dictatorial, of course! Hardly. What is in view is a godly disposition that seeks to honor God in one’s life (Titus 2:1-5). A wife who understands her God-ordained role contributes, mightily, to the strength of her family. The husband who understands his God-ordained role leads his family on the path already blazed by the Lord Jesus.

    To wrap up this thought, let us reflect (and be reminded) on the work of love. Love seeks that which is best for the other person. With regard to salvation, Jesus sought our best interest (John 3:16; Luke 19:10). With regard to personal relations, man is to love God with all of his being (which means he honors God by obeying Him), and he is to love his neighbor as himself (which means he will seek that which is best for him—as he would himself).

    Husbands, love your wives; if God brought you two together, then she is the best thing that has happened to you in personal relations. Wives, love your husbands; if God brought you two together, then not only is he the best thing that happened to you in personal relations, but his example and leadership is of such a quality that he will do you good all of your days. RT

     
  • Eugene Adkins 8:30 am on 2013-04-06 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , leadership, , ,   

    THE WAY PEOPLE TALK by Winfred Clarke 

    Here’s a good little bulletin article that actually has a sermon outline for Nehemiah mixed in. I got it from the Montrose Church of Christ which is in a neighboring county. I thought some of you might find it useful.

    THE WAY PEOPLE TALK

    Most of us are aware that people are going to talk. Men are going to have their say about things. That doesn’t mean that what they say will always be right, but they are going to talk.

    What is said by people is an indication of what is in the heart, for it is out of the “abundance of the heart that the mouth speaks.” So it behooves us to be sure that we say what we ought to say in spite of what people in general may say.

    You will see the importance of this in the book of Nehemiah. In the fourth chapter, you will find that which “Judah said,” that which the “adversaries said,” and what Nehemiah “said.” So here are at least three cases of people talking. But a great deal is learned from this as we see the “way people talk.”

    Remember that Nehemiah has returned from captivity and had undertaken the task of repairing the walls of the city of Jerusalem for such was “broken down” (Neh. 1:3). The job of restoration was underway as one group after another was given an assignment. As you read chapter three, you will see that one group would be working in one place, and the “next unto them” would be another. This is found time and again in this chapter. Look at verses 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12 of chapter three, and you will note this.  In the midst of all this activity, one will find people talking. What sort of voices will you hear?

    I. THERE IS THE VOICE OF DOUBT

    Listen to those of Judah as they say, “The strength of the bearers of burdens is decayed, and there is much rubbish; so that we are not able to build the wall” (Neh. 4:10).

    This is equal to saying “we can’t.” That means they would reach a point where they will just stop and not try. They would not put forth the effort that it would take for them to move through the rubbish. They would see it as insurmountable.

    How often have we heard these voices that would say, “it cannot be done,” but all we had to do was look around, and somebody was doing what some said could not be done. Yes, people will talk about those things that cannot be done, but they can be done.

    II. THERE IS THE VOICE OF DEFIANCE

    Notice, “And our adversaries said, They shall not know, neither see, till we come in the midst among them, and slay them, and cause the work to cease (Neh. 4:11).

    Here are people who are avowed enemies of the project being undertaken. They are not about to stand aside and allow this work to go unhindered. They will oppose it with all their might. This is nothing new, for the Devil has always opposed that which God would have done. His methods may vary, but he will oppose good works one way or the other.

    III. THERE IS THE VOICE OF DETERMINATION

    After the voices of those of Judah and the adversaries had been heard, there was need that Nehemiah speak. Somebody ought to say something that would boost the work. Somebody ought to be able to see something good. This is where the leadership of Nehemiah comes to the fore. It is said, “And I looked, and rose up, and said unto the nobles, and to the rulers, and to the rest of the people, Be not ye afraid of them: remember the Lord, which is great and terrible, and fight for your brethren, your sons, and your daughters, your wives, and your house’s (Neh. 4:14).

    Nehemiah was not about to stand back and allow this good work to be destroyed. He is not about to allow those within and without to stop such an effort.

    It would indeed have been a sad day for the cause if he had not risen to offer encouragement. Suppose he had taken to bashing the work they were doing. You would never find good men involved in any such talk as this.

    Be it to the credit of Nehemiah, that in spite of what others would say, the work would go on and succeed. So will it ever be.

    Periodicals and Bulletins, Winfred Clarke

     
  • Ron Thomas 7:00 am on 2013-03-25 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , leadership, responibility   

    Those Who Outlived 

         The Scriptures reads, “So the people served the LORD all the days of Joshua, and all the days of the elders who outlived Joshua, who had seen all the great works of the LORD which He had done for Israel” (Judges 2:7, NKJV).

         Reflect upon this for a moment and consider a few points. First, the nation of Israel had a great leader in Joshua. He was a fortunate man who had a direct line of communication to the Lord; this was much different than that which any other had. With this fortunate avenue, however, came great responsibility. To him the Lord gave the responsibility of taking the nation into the promised land and executing the Lord’s will. To have failed the Lord would have been disastrous for him and the nation.

    Second, Joshua was not a man who could carry this burden all on his own. Whatever strength of character he had, he was still just a man. He needed others to help him and on whom which he could lean. The leadership of Joshua and men who were devoted to the Lord’s way brought much success to Israel. No matter what their failing might have been in the respective lives, because they were devoted to the Lord they had success.

    Third, the failings that did actually reside within the nation of Israel did eventually began to show its ugly head when Israel’s great leadership died (Judges 2:1-2).

    Why did this happen? I would like to suggest the following possibilities. First, the teaching that was supposed to be done may not have been accomplished to the degree that it should have been. It is important to remember that what the children are taught stays with them the remainder of their days.

    Second, it may have been that the leaders taught thoroughly and with much effort, but the children did not take the lessons learned to heart like they should have. That is always a possibility and one to not forget. Ultimately, whatever a person does, whether as a child or as an adult, it is the responsibility of the doer. I can well imagine some of the elders thinking and saying to their peers, “I am very comfortable with the next generation and the leadership they will be exerting. They have demonstrated themselves well as we have tried to lead and teach them.” This could be said with humility, but once the generation of the elders passed on, that which did not take root can (and did) manifest itself in an ugly way.

    Third, the teaching may have taken root and things may have started off well enough, but something occurred that distracted the faithful from the path set for them by the Lord. The distractions could have been any number of things; it really matters not what they were. Anything that distracts actually knocks us off track. When one is knocked off track he is bound to do nothing but crash.

    It is crucial that we, as parents and leaders in the congregation, instill within others the Lord’s way by the life we live and by the words we use to communicate. We must do this. Then, when they move up and take our place they will be in better position to move the Lord’s way forward and in accordance with His revealed will.

    In Judges 2:7-10, we read of a very sad occasion resting with a the following generation; let that not happen with us. RT

     
  • Eugene Adkins 6:50 am on 2013-01-23 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Acts 1, , , , , leadership,   

    Why Roll The Dice When You Can Open The Book? 

    I listened to a sermon yesterday by a preacher for the churches of Christ that made me scratch my head at one point. I can’t say I know much at all about the congregation (although I have my ideas), but what I do know is that they listened to a sermon that I believe missed the point. The preacher was preaching from verses in Acts 1. A great place to study with great points mind you! But the confusion came in when the church, led by Peter’s understanding of the need to replace Judas’ apostleship (bishoprick), needed to choose between Barsabas and Matthias in Acts 1:15-26. The result was that the church ended up casting lots to help reveal God’s will in choosing between the two men.

    So the question was/is/may be asked why doesn’t the church do such things today? Is it a reflection of a lack of faith, trust or willingness to allow God to choose if we do not do such things when it comes to leadership or other issues in life? The answer is a resounding, “No!”

    For one, the situation in Acts 1 called for the replacement of Judas, and replacing Judas meant that only “one office” was available while two men were candidates. That’s a problem that needed a solution and a solution was found. When it comes to leadership today, the office an elder/pastor/bishop is not restricted to the necessity of one man being chosen…hence no need to roll the dice to choose only one. As a matter of fact the evidence found points in the opposite direction – a plurality of men need to be chosen, not a single individual.

    For another reason, there is no need for dice because the qualifications for elders/pastors/bishops are given in the scriptures (1 Timothy 3:1-7, Titus 1:5-9). Once men have been found who desire to serve the church, the church needs to pray and spend time of great care before the men are given this position of great responsibility. Not one time did Paul tell Timothy or Titus to leave the choosing of these leaders up to the roll of the dice, but rather that the decision should be made carefully keeping in mind the qualifications and the works (ultimately the revealed heart) of the men (1 Timothy 5:22, 24-25).

    When one reads the scriptures found in God’s word there are always lessons to be learned, but not always actions to be copied. To say that one must roll the dice to make a decision of a spiritual matter because the apostles did such does necessarily hold water. Did not Gideon (Judges 6:37-40) use fleece to make a decision? Yes, he did, but that doesn’t mean we need to do the same, does it? Different means were used in the past to make a multitude of spiritual decisions, but why try to use them when it comes to appointing leadership in the church after the clear qualifications and directions have already been given? The apostles were not playing games when they rolled the dice nor is the Spirit of God when He has revealed the will of God through God’s word for God’s church (1 Timothy 3:14-15).

    When it comes to making major spiritual decisions the scriptures encourage prayer, careful consideration and the study of God’s word; but I see no evidence that the word of God encourages people today to cast lots when it to comes to choosing the leadership in the church. Why roll the dice when you can open the book? Let no one confuse you, a person shows a faith pleasing to God when they simply follow the word that He has given in the scriptures (Romans 10:17).

     
  • Chad Dollahite 10:29 am on 2012-11-02 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , leadership, ,   

    “Follow the Leader”? [part 2] 

    We previously noticed that a nation’s leader greatly influences the behavior of that nation’s people; that a nation’s leader should not always be followed; and that, ultimately, all leadership is from God.  This week, let us continue this study by noticing 3 other points of interest in regard to national leadership.

    God uses leaders.  God often used leaders of nations to accomplish His ultimate purpose.  (More …)

     
  • Chad Dollahite 8:52 am on 2012-10-19 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , leadership, ,   

    “Follow the Leader”? 

    Children sometimes like to play the game “follow the leader,” in which one person is the leader, and the others imitate that leader’s behavior, speech, etc.  Even as adults, we often use the phrase “follow the leader” to denote our emulation of some leader’s behavior, actions, and so on.  As our country prepares to elect its next leader, this topic of leadership is especially important to consider.  Let us notice a few points of interest in this regard. (More …)

     
  • Ron Thomas 10:45 am on 2012-07-17 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , leadership, overseer,   

    Christian leadership; does it exist? Some would qualify it greatly.

    http://etsop95.wordpress.com/

     
  • Richard Mansel 8:57 am on 2011-04-19 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , leadership, , , ,   

    More Lessons From the Civil War 

    My article today examines the Civil War and the lessons we can learn from that terrible conflict. We examine the effects of racism, prejudice, hatred and division.

    The sesquicentennial of the Civil War began on April 12th. In the intervening years, have we learned the major lessons from the war? We can quickly say that we have, because we have not had another internal war on our own soil. Yet, our speedy answer may betray us.

    The Civil War was not an isolated event occurring in a vacuum. It happened because of reasons and motivations. If we have the same attitudes today, even without engaging in combat, we have learned nothing.

    As an avid student of the Civil War, I see many more lessons than I described in the article.

    For example, on both sides of the conflict, completely unqualified men were given the responsibility to lead troops when they did not possess one iota of ability to do so. It was a hopeless situation for the troops and countless numbers of men died, as a result. Why were they installed as high officers? They were successful businessmen, so certainly they could lead troops. The folly of such a decision had fatal results.

    The implications for the church are obvious. How many churches have installed men as elders simply because they were successful businessmen? These congregations overlooked the qualifications for a man to be an elder and made a political appointment, instead. The results, sadly, are the same. The army loses its way and people die.

    Another lesson we learn from the Civil War is that without the proper tools, no Army can succeed. In the second half of the War, the Confederate troops were constantly in survival mode. They routinely ran out of supplies as the Union cut off their supply routes. In time, they were without shoes, clothes, food and weapons.

    As God’s people, if we do not utilize the tools/weapons God has given to us, we will run out of supplies, as well. We will be defenseless if we fail to wear our spiritual armor (Ephesians 6:10-17). We need the fruits of the Spirit and the lessons of God’s Word with us all the time. When we leave them behind, we haven’t a chance. Moreover, if the pulpit is bereft of Godly teaching and it is missing from our homes, then we find ourselves without any means to defend ourselves.

    Finally, the Confederates fought with extraordinary courage and did things that they had no right to do with their emaciated bodies, tattered clothes and poor supplies. They fought with everything that they had. If we can separate ourselves from why they were fighting, they are an astonishing example or what courage, strength and resolve can accomplish.

    We need that resolve as Christians because we face an Army that APPEARS to be an overwhelming foe. Naturally, there is a difference because we have the Lord fighting for us (Hebrews 13:5).

    On the other hand, the Union Army suffered defeats in the beginning because they were overconfident and under-prepared. We can find ourselves in the same position if we do not arm ourselves with God’s Word. We must be humble before God, understanding our weaknesses, and committed to righteousness and evangelism. God’s grace and mercy cannot help us, if we try to fight Satan on our own (Ephesians 2:8-9). Allow God to empower you and fight ahead of you every day (Romans 12:1-2).

    What other lessons can we remember?

     
    • nick gill 9:15 am on 2011-04-19 Permalink | Reply

      Don’t assume God is on your side because your reading of Scripture seems to support your endeavor. Come to Scripture humbly, and seek to be on God’s side, rather than trying to recruit Him for your endeavors.

    • Dave Dugan 10:26 am on 2011-04-19 Permalink | Reply

      Richard what about some of our brethren that are still
      fighting the civil war. I went to a brother’s home and there was a bust of Andrew Jackson on top of the TV. I thought that was interesting and asked him about it; I got an earful of “the south shall rise again” from this brother. Some never learn the lessons of war. Some never learn the lessons of Christianity either.

    • Tim Hester 12:26 pm on 2011-04-19 Permalink | Reply

      Dave, I know many Christians who display pictures, plaques, statuettes, etc… of War Between The States themes but they don’t look for the south to rise again. Is one wrong for remembering his heritage and the things his forefathers for which his forefathers died? Although as Richard pointed out many officers who were not leaders plaqued both the north and the south but on the other hand some of the greatest military minds in history were on both sides. I have a small figurine of Stonewall Jackson by my bed because I admire him as a person and a leader of men.

    • Weylan Deaver 3:20 pm on 2011-04-19 Permalink | Reply

      I’ve done a bit of study on the War–even took an undergraduate class on it at FHU. My great-great grandfather, Benjamin Franklin Truesdell, fought for the Union in Company D, 47th Missouri Infantry. But I’m from the South, and my distant cousin, Confederate Lt. Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest, and I share the same great(x)-grandfather in Shadrack Forrest. Relatively speaking, I’d say the Civil War was civil–at least to a degree (Gen. Sherman, excepted)–compared to the way wars are prosecuted today (e.g. with terrorist bombers, I.E.D.s, and the outrageous killing of civilians, women, children). At least back then you had men trying to abide by codes of honor and wage campaigns according to standards of behavior emanating from a society in large part closer to the Scriptures than 21st century America. Many on both sides held to high moral ideals, though I suspect gallantry and chivalry were weighted more heavily on the Southern side. As you pointed out, neither side had a godly attitude toward blacks, and that is inexcusable. But, to me, the Confederate view on states’ rights is increasingly vindicated as we are, today, subjected to an ever encroaching government that runs roughshod over the Constitution. That the North won does not mean they had everything (or even most things) right. I’ve got no problem with either side paying tribute to its heritage with a picture of Stonewall Jackson or Lee or Grant or Lincoln. No problem with statues, parks and schools named in their honor, or Confederate flags flying, etc. I named my youngest son Forrest, after the Southern general. I’m no racist. I’m not re-fighting the Civil War. I take no responsibility or blame for the way blacks were treated by either side back then. Neither am I accepting unconstitutional mandates from today’s Washington. I would not doubt divine providence was involved in the war’s result, to the further outworking of God’s greater plan for the good of the church, though it is interesting to imagine how things might be different today had it gone the other way. I assume slavery would have played out, even had the South won.

  • John Henson 6:55 pm on 2011-04-14 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , leadership,   

    No Aim 

    Since replies are limited to Tim Hester’s secret method (how’d he do that?), I’m choosing this way of replying to Richard’s article on the “Greatest Problem in the Church.” It is related closely to what Richard wrote.

    It takes aim to shoot a firearm, an arrow or a space shuttle. It takes aim to throw a football, a basketball, or shoot a golf ball. Corporations realize the importance of aim whenever they set their purpose statements and goals. But, how many churches take aim in the important things they do?

    No preparation of men to become elders means no aim. No goals for spiritual or numerical growth mean no aim. No purpose statement means no aim. Churches that have those programs, purpose statements and goals take dead aim. They know where they want to take the church and how to get there.

    The rest, if they ever get there at all, go by accident. That, my brothers and sisters, is tragic, and does not serve the Master well at all.

     
  • Richard Mansel 12:04 pm on 2011-04-14 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , leadership   

    Greatest Problem in the Church 

    If you asked most people in the Lord’s body, to name the biggest problem in the church, most would probably say false doctrine. While that is certainly plentiful, that would not be an issue if we had better men in leadership. Accordingly, I think the biggest problem we have in the Lord’s church is that we need more godly Elders.

    Do we encourage young men to work toward becoming Elders? Is it even considered a priority any more? Why do we have so many congregations over 10o members that do not have Elders? How do we change that?

    What do you think is the greatest problem in the church?

     
    • Mike Riley 9:44 pm on 2011-04-15 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, in my view, the greatest problem in the Lord’s church is indifference toward the authority of the Scriptures, with regard to instrumental music, marriage-divorce-remarriage, authority of elders, frequency of observing the Lord’s Supper, etc.

      • Richard Mansel 9:49 pm on 2011-04-15 Permalink | Reply

        All of these are serious problems. My point is that if congregations across the brotherhood had strong leaders, then these things would not be so prevalent.

  • Richard Mansel 9:54 pm on 2010-09-05 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , leadership,   

    Richard Hill’s Article at Forthright 

    Someone indicated that they were having problems with an earlier link. Here it is again. Richard wrote a good article on the “Dangerous ‘They'” and how they threaten the Lord’s Church.

     
  • Richard Mansel 9:46 am on 2010-09-04 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , leadership   

    Serious Threat to the Lord’s Church 

    Other than false teachers, no one does more damage to the Lord’s work than “THEY.” Richard Hill gives us a good reminder today at  Forthright.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel