Tagged: legalism Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • John T. Polk II 7:02 pm on 2016-09-22 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , legalism,   

    9-20-2016 Love And Baptism 

    “And this is His commandment: that we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ and love one another, as He gave us commandment” (1 John 3:23 NKJV).  “Love one another” is about the only statement some people think is in the Bible!  They then object to any other “commandment” as “legalism,” not to be obeyed.  John said God gave the “commandment” to “love one another.”  Was God commanding “legalism?”  Jesus said, “that the world may know that I love the Father, and as the Father gave Me commandment, so I do” (John 14:31 NKJV).  Was Jesus a “legalist” because He kept God’s “commandment” to “love?” Was Peter a “legalist” when “he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord” (Acts 10:48 NKJV)?  Why is keeping the commandments of God “legalism,” but not keeping the command to love?

    This is Johnny Polk, with “Words of Wisdom” brought to you by the Oneida church of Christ.

     
  • TFRStaff 5:47 am on 2013-08-27 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , legalism,   

    Hugh’s News & Views (Legalism) 

    Hugh’s news & Views

    IS OBEDIENCE LEGALISM?

    Sometime ago I received an email from a brother in Christ that told of a group of deacons who had resigned and who along with their wives had left the congregation where they had been serving in order to form a “grace preaching” church. It got me to wondering: has anyone ever left a congregation in order to form an “obedience preaching” church? Are grace and obedience mutually exclusive?

    Frequently, when obedience is emphasized the charge of “legalism” is hurled against those who give that emphasis. Is it being “legalistic” to emphasize obedience to the Lord in all things? What is legalism?

    Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, says, “Legalism, in Christian theology, is a usually pejorative term referring to an over-emphasis on discipline of conduct, or legal ideas, usually implying an allegation of misguided rigor, pride, superficiality, the neglect of mercy, and ignorance of the grace of God or emphasizing the letter of [the] law at the expense of the spirit. Legalism is alleged against any view that obedience to law, not faith in God’s grace, is the pre-eminent principle of redemption.”

    Interestingly, neither “legalist” nor “legalism” is to be found in the Bible. But there are legalists to be found on the pages of the New Testament to be sure. The Judaizing teachers who dogged the footsteps of Paul, teaching that Gentile Christians, in addition to submitting to the gospel, must also keep the Law of Moses were legalists in the bad sense of the word. Paul deals with them in a number of his letters, most notably in Galatians. The Pharisees of Jesus’ day often concerned themselves with the minutest details of the Mosaic covenant while neglecting “the weightier matters of the law.” However, Jesus never indicated that they were wrong in giving attention to the “little matters”; rather, He said, “These [the weightier matters, hf] you ought to have done, without leaving the others [the little things, hf] undone” (Matthew 23:23).

    The reality is that obedience to the gospel and strict adherence to the will of God as set forth in the New Testament is not legalism in the bad sense of that word. God never gave a command that He did not intend for the one/ones to whom it was given to obey it! If so, which one was it?

    Paul “received grace and apostleship for obedience to the faith among all nations for His name” (Romans 1:5, emphasis mine, hf). The “mystery which was kept secret since the world began” was, in time, made known “for obedience to the faith” (Romans 16:25-26, emphasis mine, hf). “The faith” is the gospel, and obedience must be given to that faith! (Alternate renderings (ASV, NASB, et al) say “the obedience of faith,” but either way, obedience to the gospel is the end in view.)

    In refutation of the Judaizers, Paul affirmed, “Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing, but keeping the commandments of God is what counts” (I Corinthians 7:19). In a similar statement, the apostle wrote, “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love” (Galatians 5:6). What a tremendous thought: faith (the principle) working (obeying) through love (the motive)! This is legalism of the very best kind—adherence to the will of God out of a heart of love!

    Jesus said, “If you love Me, keep My commandments” (John 14:15). He further said, “You are My friends if you do whatever I command you” (John 15:14). The apostle John placed great emphasis on commandment keeping. He wrote, “By this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. He who says, ‘I know Him,’ and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him” (I John 2:3-4). Strong words from the apostle of love!

    All informed Christians understand that they are saved by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9). But neither grace nor faith negates the necessity of obedience. Of Christ it is said that “though He was a Son, yet He learned obedience by the things which He suffered. And having been perfected, He became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him” (Hebrews 5:8-9).

    Moses E. Lard, one of the great Bible scholars devoted to the restoration of New Testament Christianity, wrote: “The term legalism I do not like. It is an offensive term, with a bad sense as popularly used, and should, therefore, not be employed. Obedience to the commandments of Christ is its exact equivalent, and should always be used in its stead. But few men, however, could be found bold enough to speak against obeying the commandments of Christ. The results here would be too glaring. None would fail to see it, and few would hesitate to pronounce it infidelity. A more insidious method is adopted. Legalism is the thing inveighed against. But the act amounts to the same. Legalism and obedience to Christ’s commands are the same. Hence to speak against that is to speak against this. Nor have I any respect for the man who masks the law of Christ, and then speaks against it, than I have for him who insults it indirectly” (As cited by Earl I. West, The Search for the Ancient Order, Volume II, p. 269). Brother Lard’s statement remains unassailable in spite of the efforts of the antinomians among us to belittle it!

    The final beatitude of the Bible gives this wonderful assurance: “Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city” (Revelation 22:14). No one can earn eternal salvation, but no one has the right to the tree of life and heaven who does not obey the commandments of the Lord!

    Hugh Fulford

    August 27, 2013

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 4:20 am on 2012-03-09 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , legalism,   

    More comfortable with being uncomfortable 

    Productive Living on Davidco

    People are more comfortable being uncomfortable than being comfortable, if they have been uncomfortable for an extended period of time. It’s simply an ingrained pattern, and familiarity is more comfortable than novelty. Most people have for so long experienced the gnawing sense of anxiety about all the un-captured and un-clarified “work” of their life, that’s what they’re used to. Then no matter how clean and in control they get at some point, they will soon let themselves slide, let things mount up again, unprocessed, sufficiently to get them back to the level of stress they are accustomed to.

    This point seems to offer a spiritual application as well. People are often more comfortable with their old sinful life than with the life of Christ, than with the “feeling of freedom,” as Allen mentioned. We love our burdens and weights too much to lay them down. We want to keep our old familiar prejudices and hates and habits. Along with the context of Galatians, might not this truth give extra meaning to chap. 5, verse 1,

    “For freedom Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not be subject again to the yoke of slavery.”

    Christ has given us freedom. That freedom was meant to be exercised and enjoyed, not stifled by the inner or religious need to prove one’s own worth to God. This hopeless effort produces only frustration, but some, who already know only this, prefer it to the freedom of having sins totally forgiven and living in the free obedience to the will of God.

    Enhanced by Zemanta
     
  • Ron Thomas 10:23 am on 2010-03-27 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , legalism,   

    Favorite Passage on Obedience 

    Passages of obedience always start with self. In apply Scripture to myself, I think not of only one. “Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong” (1 Cor 16.13, ESV). Another one that quickly comes to mind: “Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Or do you not realize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?–unless indeed you fail to meet the test!” (2 Cor. 13.5. ESV).

    Reflecting on Job (once again), I am sure to apply these sentiments to myself. Where do I stand in relation to the Lord? After I answer that, then, perhaps, I can help one who is struggling in their own spirituality. The friends of Job were sure that Job’s experience was the result of a hidden wickedness within; consequently, in their “knowledge” they knew nothing at all.

    Randal’s remark about how some brethren look at obedience as legalism is very true. It appears they fail to see the difference between commitment to the Lord and self-interest. The former does not struggle with “legalism,” while the latter, on occasion, does.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel